AZOM EXIGO V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAZOM EXIGO V2  (all builds)
MotherboardAZOM EXIGO V2 powered by premamod.com
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '21 at 17:26
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 87.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 224
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 587
63% 499 Pts
64-Core 604
37% 604 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 7506) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.6% Very good
Lighting 91.2
Reflection 119
Parallax 92.3
74% 101 fps
MRender 91.5
Gravity 92.5
Splatting 100
78% 94.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 255 254 141 107 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 459
Write 406
Mixed 347
SusWrite 192
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 46.3
160% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 151
121% 176 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 124%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
261GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 90 89 77 70 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 94.7
Write 78.5
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 79.4
50% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
114% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C16-8GRS 04CB DDR4 2666 2OZ 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.6% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 21.6
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 22.2
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 55: 10R 0G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
55% 10% 152 296 218 60 15.5" 1536 864 LGD046F
Typical EXIGO V2 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

System: AZOM EXIGO V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $267
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback