Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory59.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '17 at 19:58
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 172
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 685
61% 514 Pts
64-Core 1,912
118% 1,912 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 382.5
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 68% Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,337
Write 1,504
Mixed 1,417
318% 1,420 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 63.1
208% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 519
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 155
181% 319 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 228%
Great: 353%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
99GB free
Firmware: X41100RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 467
Write 329
Mixed 308
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 43.3
4K Mixed 18.6
95% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 42.2
72% 142 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 108%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
34GB free
Firmware: 505A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 505
Write 165
Mixed 213
64% 294 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 20.5
104% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 43.1
63% 117 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 73%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$45
844GB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 133
Write 171
Mixed 130
108% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 5.27
4K Mixed 0.44
173% 2.11 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2400 C14 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 61.7
MC Write 46.2
MC Mixed 49.2
150% 52.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 18.2
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 130%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $770
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback