TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 4263AW5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics68.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 4263AW5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo
Memory10.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140114
Uptime18.1 Days
Run DateNov 19 '21 at 09:09
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
1366-pin LGA, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 130
60% 96.1 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 463
46% 376 Pts
64-Core 1,012
63% 1,012 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 73.1%
 Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Zotac(19DA 5527)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.1% Good
Lighting 84.6
Reflection 84.2
Parallax 76.8
69% 81.9 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 76.4
Splatting 69
66% 83.5 fps
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 68.1%
 Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 227 231 230 232 231 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.2% Above average
Read 246
Write 216
Mixed 201
SusWrite 229
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 24.3
82% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 176
138% 191 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 58.2%
 Great: 130%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
16GB free
Firmware: 10.02E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 51
Write 48.5
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 39.3
33% 44.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 26.1%
 Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 18KSF51272PDZ1G4D 00EC M393B1K70BH1-CH9 00C2 18KSF51272PDZ1G4D 00C2 18KSF51272PDZ1G4D 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.9% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 10.8
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8.9
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 4263AW5 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 4263AW5

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples2x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56601stBench 66%, 2,343 samples1x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples1x
GPU
Radeon RX 570AMDBench 30%, 3,798 samples1x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples1x
Radeon HD 5400ATIBench 1%, 10,400 samples1x
SSD
SL300 128GBColorfulBench 63%, 1,103 samples1x
256G 256GBHs-ssd-e100Bench 74%, 2,993 samples1x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples1x
RAM
HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 30B0 NT8GC72B4NB1NK-CG 00EC M393B1K70BH1-CH9 30B0 NT8GC72B4NB1NK-CG 32GBUnknownBench 43%, 2 samples1x
18KSF51272PDZ1G4D 00EC M393B1K70BH1-CH9 00C2 18KSF51272PDZ1G4D 00C2 18KSF51272PDZ1G4D 20GBUnknownBench 35%, 1 sample1x
HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 26%, 5 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback