bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150917
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateNov 18 '21 at 14:26
Run Duration301 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0
CPU socket #0, 4 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 75.9
1-Core 62.1
2-Core 122
53% 86.8 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 391
39% 317 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 64GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 246 245 245 243 245 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
65% Good
Read 364
Write 402
Mixed 374
SusWrite 245
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 27.8
4K Mixed 22.4
72% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 320
231% 300 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 65%
Great: 79%
Vmware Virtual disk 1TB
264GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 246 245 245 243 230 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65% Good
Read 368
Write 405
Mixed 370
SusWrite 242
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 22.5
73% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 309
224% 294 MB/s
Vmware Virtual disk 1TB
60GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 79 74 74 82 65 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.9% Poor
Read 84.8
Write 91.6
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 76.3
19% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 10.5
36% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 60.4
DQ Write 63.9
DQ Mixed 54.7
43% 59.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 64 slots used
32GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.9% Above average
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 12.1
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,470 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback