Gigabyte GA-H510M S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H510M S2H  (all builds)
Memory60.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '21 at 12:15
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700KF-$225
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 82.6
1-Core 181
2-Core 381
112% 215 Pts
4-Core 700
8-Core 1,225
116% 962 Pts
64-Core 1,769
110% 1,769 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 107%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000
Nvidia(10DE 129F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 15GB, Driver: 472.47
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 176
Parallax 181
146% 178 fps
MRender 148
Gravity 157
Splatting 145
122% 150 fps
Poor: 122%
This bench: 130%
Great: 137%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS2130 1TB SSD
871GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS213530
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1906 1914 1898 1917 1916 1922 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 1,022
Write 1,625
Mixed 1,108
SusWrite 1,912
322% 1,417 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 66.6
219% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 685
DQ Write 1,515
DQ Mixed 867
726% 1,022 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 275%
Great: 298%
Toshiba HDWG440 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0601
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 227 228 227 229 229 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 231
Write 221
Mixed 109
SusWrite 228
144% 197 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.9
202% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 132%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer GD2.1833WH.003 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
105% Outstanding
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 30.6
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 43.9
SC Mixed 34
99% 34.7 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H510M S2H Builds (Compare 1,213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H510M S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $419
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback