Lenovo 20BFA191PB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20BFA191PB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20BFA191PB
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '21 at 09:00
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4900MQ-$110
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 111
2-Core 208
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 524
56% 448 Pts
64-Core 529
33% 529 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 221E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.72% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 7.5
3% 5.9 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 5.4
5% 5.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.72%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 897 502 500 503 505 505 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
261GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 479 480 480 480 480 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 448
Mixed 380
SusWrite 479
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 42.5
142% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 360
268% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 108%
Great: 134%
Adata SP600NS34 256GB
192GB free
Firmware: 5.8f
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 302 303 304 303 303 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 424
Write 302
Mixed 247
SusWrite 303
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 26.1
101% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 77.5
DQ Write 70.6
DQ Mixed 45.4
42% 64.5 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.8% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 18.7
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 19.9
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20BFA191PB Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20BFA191PB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback