Lenovo 20BFA191PB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20BFA191PB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20BFA191PB
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '21 at 20:24
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4900MQ-$110
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 204
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 508
55% 435 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 221E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.56% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 6.8
3% 5.67 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.3
4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.56%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
354GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 600 802 501 505 496 505 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Adata SP600NS34 256GB
197GB free
Firmware: 5.8f
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 305 305 305 304 304 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 381
Write 305
Mixed 236
SusWrite 304
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 24.4
93% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 77.7
DQ Write 71.6
DQ Mixed 50.7
45% 66.7 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 94%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
320GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 463 465 465 463 464 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 462
Mixed 373
SusWrite 464
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 40
134% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 243
202% 295 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 104%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
57% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 18
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 19.1
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20BFA191PB Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20BFA191PB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback