Asus Q304UAK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus Q304UAK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q304UAK
Memory5.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160720
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateNov 18 '21 at 03:13
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 169
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 277
37% 275 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 1480) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.95% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 7
5% 5.5 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 8.8
Splatting 0.2
2% 3.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.95%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
864GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 73 75 76 73 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 460
Write 432
Mixed 364
SusWrite 90
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 28.6
116% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 351
263% 351 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF51264HZ-2G3A2 01BA 8GBU1X08JGGG39-12-K 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.9% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.7
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q304UAK Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Q304UAK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $45
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback