PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P8P67 PRO (all builds) |
Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20121101 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 17 '21 at 21:30 |
Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 12% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
|
70.5%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.6%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 209 211 215 189 117 MB/s
|
59.4%
Above average
|
|||
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 114 111 111 115 MB/s
|
71.2%
Very good
|
|||
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
47GB free
Firmware: 12.01B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 47 48 48 48 48 MB/s
|
27.2%
Poor
|
|||
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 132 132 130 134 MB/s
|
79.2%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905471-006.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 9905471-006.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
48.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 460x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 288x |
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 101x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 112x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 72x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 58x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $849 |