Lenovo 90AV000TFR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 90AV000TFR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140610
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateNov 17 '21 at 18:49
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 167
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 250
33% 245 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 19.3
Parallax 21.3
18% 20.9 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 17.5
18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 446
Write 390
Mixed 376
90% 404 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 39
128% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 278
223% 313 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
64GB free
Firmware: CC62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 130 133 138 148 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 157
Write 122
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 136
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.4
424% 3 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1315 CT102464BD160B.C16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.3% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 17.4
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90AV000TFR Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90AV000TFR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $404
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback