TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP 255 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive91% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 255 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 85EA
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201214
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 17 '21 at 13:17
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 144
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 220
29% 217 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 51.2%
 Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
HP(103C 85EA) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.10.34
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.46% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 7.6
5% 6.9 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 12.3
7% 8.07 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 5.46%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv CRAS C710 M.2 NVMe SSD 256GB
218GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM60.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 774 752 179 183 184 178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 714
Write 917
Mixed 520
SusWrite 375
142% 632 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 43.3
4K Mixed 22
77% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 474
323% 396 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑
This bench: 91%
 Great: 231%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JU007C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 114 114 115 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
75% Very good
Read 145
Write 137
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 114
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.6
245% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 75%
 Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB8GS2666.C8PT 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 13.6
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 44.5%
 Great: 45%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 255 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 649 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP 255 G7 Notebook PC

CPU
Ryzen 5 3500UAMDBench 48%, 78,189 samples142x
Ryzen 3 2200UAMDBench 45%, 15,631 samples105x
Ryzen 3 3200UAMDBench 41%, 21,522 samples87x
GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples142x
Radeon Vega 3 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 27,821 samples128x
RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 5%, 18,674 samples105x
SSD
MTFDDAV256TDL-1AW1ZABHA 256GBCrucialBench 68%, 1,090 samples65x
KIOXIA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 113%, 8,196 samples46x
MZNLN256HAJQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 4,927 samples43x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples101x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples51x
HP26D4S9S8HJ-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 4,524 samples36x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback