ECS BAT-I2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardECS BAT-I2  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151008
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateNov 17 '21 at 06:57
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1800
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Memory 55.9
1-Core 24.4
2-Core 48.9
30% 43.1 Pts
4-Core 48.8
8-Core 48.8
6% 48.8 Pts
64-Core 48.7
3% 48.7 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 99CF) 1.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.76% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.73 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.76%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 202 193 214 199 191 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.7% Above average
Read 250
Write 198
Mixed 128
SusWrite 203
44% 195 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 30.6
94% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 120
90% 121 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 105%
USB DISK 2.0 4GB
3GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.6 7.3 7.4 5.4 6.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.05% Terrible
Read 17.7
Write 4.3
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 6.1
8% 7.47 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.05%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R534G1601S1SL 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 6
16% 5.5 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical BAT-I2 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS BAT-I2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback