Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H110M-DS2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200817
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 16 '21 at 09:05
Run Duration345 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 73
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 172
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 345
33% 270 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.9% Poor
Lighting 35.1
Reflection 39.4
Parallax 37
29% 37.2 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 37
Splatting 26.1
27% 33.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 386
Write 352
Mixed 345
80% 361 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 49.4
151% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 236
207% 311 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate ST3320310CS 320GB
263GB free
Firmware: SC14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 75 74 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 66.8
Write 70.2
Mixed 39.6
SusWrite 73.6
46% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 54%
Generic Mass-Storage 2GB
1GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3 2.8 3 2.9 3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 1.2
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 2.9
5% 5.25 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron V-GeN D4M16GL24A8 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
37% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 10.3
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 94.7
42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-DS2-CF Builds (Compare 2,376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback