Lenovo 20KMS0AD00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20KMS0AD00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20KMS0AD00
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200306
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateNov 15 '21 at 18:49
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A12-9800B R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Memory 59.9
1-Core 36.3
2-Core 91.2
38% 62.5 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 132
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Legend(17AA 511E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.40.12.17
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.36% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 8.3
4% 6.63 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 5.9
5% 5.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.36%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
599GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 147 270 332 364 589 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 1,097
Write 626
Mixed 610
SusWrite 350
149% 671 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 17.8
84% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 23
DQ Mixed 37.9
56% 113 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH S949B2SUH-ITR 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.1% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 10.2
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 6.9
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20KMS0AD00 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20KMS0AD00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback