Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 820-$119 2,269 User benchmarks, average bench 52% None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Memory 72.3 1-Core 30.1 2-Core 53.8 37% 52.1 Pts	4-Core 95.7 8-Core 136 14% 116 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 880M 4,542 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 2145) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	2.41% Terrible	Lighting 2.8 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 1.3 2% 2.13 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 2.8 3% 3.37 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.41% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD 16,267 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900J13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 136 42 37 38 45 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.4% Poor	Read 135 Write 92.7 Mixed 76.1 SusWrite 77.5 21% 95.3 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 18.1 4K Mixed 16.2 47% 15.1 MB/s	DQ Read 19.3 DQ Write 35.8 DQ Mixed 25.9 20% 27 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 11.9 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 7.8 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 96.1 42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7 Q 820Intel $119Bench 52%, 2,269 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro FX 880MNvidiaBench 2%, 4,542 samples	1x

SSD
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	1x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $119

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16