ONDA H310CD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemONDA H310CD3  (all builds)
MotherboardONDA H310CD3
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190522
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 15 '21 at 16:05
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 86.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 246
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 706
73% 586 Pts
64-Core 698
43% 698 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2007 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Lighting 72.3
Reflection 73.6
Parallax 67.7
59% 71.2 fps
MRender 68.9
Gravity 73.8
Splatting 67.7
57% 70.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 24 11 12 23 9.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 25.3
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 15.1
15% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 70%
Hitachi HDT725030VLA380 300GB
2GB free
Firmware: V5BOA78A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 61.3
Write 58.5
Mixed 37.1
39% 52.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 39%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
18GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 108 109 109 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 102
Write 93.2
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 109
66% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 88%
Seagate BUP Slim 2TB
1GB free
Firmware: 0004
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 59.5
Write 81.5
Mixed 71.9
54% 71 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
109% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 70%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
7GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 96 88 92 92 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 86.4
Write 78.7
Mixed 64
SusWrite 98.8
111% 82 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.4
160% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 65%
WD My Passport 259F 1TB
9GB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 82 72 75 75 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 67
Write 67.9
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 72.5
85% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
72% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.7% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.5
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 16.9
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310CD3 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: ONDA H310CD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback