Avita NS15A5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 9 months ago.
SystemAvita NS15A5  (all builds)
MotherboardAVITA 6F15DR5M80
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 15 '21 at 14:21
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 53.7
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 124
48% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 384
37% 304 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Device(1DC2 2209) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.36
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.52% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 4.5
3% 3.5 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.52%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SA530 SDASN8Y512G 512GB
447GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 40103000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 356 378 374 373 371 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 340
Write 284
Mixed 295
SusWrite 366
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 36.6
107% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 203
155% 211 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Spectek HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.7% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 20.5
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 19.9
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NS15A5 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Avita NS15A5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback