ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX300 S5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX300 S5 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2619
Memory	6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130204
Uptime	23.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '21 at 06:25
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5530 662 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	61.8% Good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 66.1 2-Core 131 58% 93.5 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 310 33% 266 Pts	64-Core 306 19% 306 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 67%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI MegaRAID SAS RMB 293GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 142GB free Firmware: 1.40 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 74 115 105 138 233 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	62.6% Good	Read 457 Write 413 Mixed 408 SusWrite 126 79% 351 MB/s	4K Read 38.3 4K Write 24.7 4K Mixed 26.8 106% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 67.8 60% 91 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 123%
GOODRAM 240GB 8,481 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 176GB free Firmware: SBFM71.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 48 72 63 91 160 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.1% Poor	Read 143 Write 92.2 Mixed 76 SusWrite 81.8 22% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 17.6 4K Mixed 8.2 36% 12.1 MB/s	DQ Read 9.7 DQ Write 19.2 DQ Mixed 14 11% 14.3 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 102%
LSI MegaRAID SAS RMB 54GB 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.40 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 13 20 13 24 57 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	142% Outstanding	Read 455 Write 47.8 Mixed 110 SusWrite 23.6 117% 159 MB/s	4K Read 49.8 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 2 2,314% 17.6 MB/s

LSI MegaRAID SAS RMB 250GB 232GB free Firmware: 1.40 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.9 12 11 16 30 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	57.5% Above average	Read 185 Write 31.8 Mixed 45.3 SusWrite 15 51% 69.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.8 204% 1.3 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x2GB 8,850 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 8 of 18 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.6% Below average	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 11.2 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 10.6 SC Mixed 10.8 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback