Biostar H81MG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar H81MG  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140627
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 15 '21 at 03:12
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 52.4
1-Core 51.8
2-Core 96.7
40% 67 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 231
24% 193 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.01% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 3.6
3% 3.67 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 3.7
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.01%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X6256G 256GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 198 209 222 193 191 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.8% Above average
Read 224
Write 208
Mixed 191
SusWrite 203
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 15.4
75% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 51.6
68% 124 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
798GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 210 205 210 209 210 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 214
Write 151
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 208
120% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 121%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C11-8GNT 0420 F3-1600C11-4GNT 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
30.9% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 10.9
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 6
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81MG Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H81MG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback