Medion P6681 MD60677

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMedion P6681 MD60677  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION E15KR
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '21 at 15:40
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 187
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 245
33% 248 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Device(1B0A 2318) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7212
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Lighting 25.8
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 25.7
21% 27 fps
MRender 34.2
Gravity 26.6
Splatting 16
20% 25.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$56
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 107 94 57 36 29 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 451
Write 383
Mixed 310
SusWrite 85.9
68% 308 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 10.6
68% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 85.9
DQ Mixed 32.2
43% 77.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 55%
Seagate ST1000DM 010-2EP102 1TB
236GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 173 172 173 169 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 142
Mixed 91.6
SusWrite 169
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 0898 KD48GS88C-26N1900 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
72.7% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 22.2
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 22.7
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6681 MD60677 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Medion P6681 MD60677

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $45
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback