Lenovo 80RU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 80RU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo ideapad 700-15ISK
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180614
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateNov 14 '21 at 12:59
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 92.8
2-Core 178
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 329
46% 340 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 72%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 380A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4526
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.59% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 17
Parallax 5.5
4% 9.13 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 9
6% 6.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.59%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN500 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$35
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 201000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 571 414 416 415 404 401 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 789
Write 751
Mixed 706
SusWrite 437
151% 671 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 59.3
203% 72.9 MB/s
DQ Read 856
DQ Write 625
DQ Mixed 524
450% 668 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 154%
Great: 193%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB
7GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 16
Write 119
Mixed 29.4
40% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
63% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 75%
Asmt 2115 1TB
640GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.1 9.3 9.1 9.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.09% Terrible
Read 8.3
Write 10.3
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 9.4
7% 8.88 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 5.09%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC Kingston 9905700-015.A00G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
68.4% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 20.8
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 19.1
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80RU Builds (Compare 1,459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80RU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback