Lenovo 3497A37

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3497A37  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120823
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 14 '21 at 07:38
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$137
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 190
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 471
53% 416 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 308C) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.13% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.23 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 1
Splatting 2.9
2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.13%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 97 86 90 52 93 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.1% Poor
Read 219
Write 199
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 94
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 2.6
45% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25.4
DQ Write 83.8
DQ Mixed 17.2
24% 42.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 92%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$30
380GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 30 30 30 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 2
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 29.2
16% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 1.1
264% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 64%
Samsung Storage 32GB
29GB free, PID 0112
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 8.3 14 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 18.5
Write 12.9
Mixed 16.9
SusWrite 13.7
21% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 2
168% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 19%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
1GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 25.6
Write 19.1
Mixed 4.2
18% 16.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-074.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.5% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 9.2
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3497A37 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3497A37

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback