Aftershock NH50_70RA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAftershock NH50_70RA  (all builds)
MotherboardAftershock NH50_70RA
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190430
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateNov 14 '21 at 03:19
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 91.5
1-Core 68.9
2-Core 114
59% 91.4 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 185
22% 172 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 8560) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7196
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44% Average
Lighting 57.4
Reflection 62.5
Parallax 50.6
47% 56.8 fps
MRender 41.3
Gravity 50.2
Splatting 48.4
38% 46.6 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ASE12NVME512 512GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 563 353 303 223 26 208 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 555
Write 959
Mixed 305
SusWrite 279
118% 525 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 20.2
82% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 447
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 364
274% 370 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 222%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
645GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 103 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 96.2
Write 97.9
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 102
67% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.8
199% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 17
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 17.3
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NH50_70RA Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Aftershock NH50_70RA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback