Asus GL502VMK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus GL502VMK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL502VMK
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190503
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 13 '21 at 22:14
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 41.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 217
63% 122 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 593
58% 478 Pts
64-Core 578
36% 578 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1800) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.6% Below average
Lighting 50.4
Reflection 54.4
Parallax 55.5
41% 53.4 fps
MRender 57.6
Gravity 59
Splatting 0.2
28% 38.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC-WRSN 1TB
384GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 281 270 251 281 252 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 373
Write 306
Mixed 246
SusWrite 239
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 13.4
45% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 92.1
DQ Mixed 122
89% 117 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
76.7% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 22.9
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 23.2
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 195
20% 195 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL502VMK Builds (Compare 750 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Asus GL502VMK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback