HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook 8570w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 176B
Memory	27 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190419
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 13 '21 at 15:54
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220 14,369 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Memory 76.8 1-Core 100 2-Core 194 70% 124 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 489 51% 410 Pts	64-Core 492 30% 492 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro M4000 1,496 User benchmarks, average bench 7% HP(103C 176B) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	7.28% Terrible	Lighting 8.9 Reflection 13.2 Parallax 12.5 7% 11.5 fps	MRender 9.4 Gravity 9.2 Splatting 8.5 7% 9.03 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.28% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,666 Write 4585 Mixed 3,424 941% 4,225 MB/s	4K Read 316 4K Write 164 4K Mixed 186 804% 222 MB/s	DQ Read 779 DQ Write 428 DQ Mixed 538 418% 582 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Kingston SUV500MS240G 240GB 1,225 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 18GB free Firmware: 003056RR SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 87 37 45 69 34 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.5% Average	Read 244 Write 229 Mixed 214 SusWrite 81.1 43% 192 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 33.8 4K Mixed 24.3 81% 26.4 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 148 123% 177 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 87%
Samsung 980 PRO 2TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 283GB free Firmware: 0209 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	16.7% Very poor	Read 44.6 Write 40.8 Mixed 42.6 SusWrite 41.1 10% 42.3 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 11.4 4K Mixed 11.3 37% 11.3 MB/s	DQ Read 16.5 DQ Write 17.2 DQ Mixed 16.7 13% 16.8 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-417.A00LF 9905428-105.A00G 9905428-417.A00LF 9905428-105.A00G 32GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.8% Above average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.5 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 18 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 86.7 46% 86.7 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	15.6"	1280 720	LGD02D9

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	228x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	198x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	170x

GPU
Quadro K1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 4,204 samples	495x
Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples	297x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	37x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	39x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $104Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	21x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	20x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GBMicronBench 50%, 5,422 samples	17x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16