Lenovo 435118U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 435118U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory42.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200828
Uptime6.4 Days
Run DateNov 13 '21 at 03:29
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 99
2-Core 187
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 686
61% 517 Pts
64-Core 884
55% 884 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
XFX(1682 956D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 31.3
19% 27.5 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 25.4
Splatting 20
19% 23.9 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingFast 512GB
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 33 34 255 156 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 352
Write 210
Mixed 362
SusWrite 154
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 28.6
99% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 213
180% 259 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 187%
Seagate ST3000NM0033-9ZM178 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 183 181 183 185 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 170
Mixed 94.5
SusWrite 183
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 103%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0- Micron 36KSF2G72PZ-1 M393B2G70BH0- 48GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.2% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 26.2
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.8
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 435118U Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 435118U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback