Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400 26,927 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Memory 71.5 1-Core 103 2-Core 183 68% 119 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 430 45% 361 Pts	64-Core 365 23% 365 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 75%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Edge E3 SSD 500GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 235GB free (System drive) Firmware: N1007C SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 284 326 265 265 170 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Read 430 Write 357 Mixed 287 SusWrite 278 76% 338 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 35.6 4K Mixed 22.7 75% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 269 DQ Write 272 DQ Mixed 196 168% 246 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1315 CT102464BF160B.C16 HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1315 CT102464BF160B.C16 32GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.3% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 14.2 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 14.3 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 97.9 41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2100MNvidiaBench 7%, 6,539 samples	202x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	96x
Quadro K1100MNvidiaBench 5%, 5,195 samples	92x

SSD
SD7SB2Q-512G-1006 512GBSandiskBench 83%, 1,918 samples	21x
SD6PP4M-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 81%, 1,500 samples	17x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	34x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	21x
16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 51%, 8,416 samples	21x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $400

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16