HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Z620 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 158A
Memory	58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120620
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '21 at 15:15
Run Duration	468 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2,104 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Memory 78.5 1-Core 80.1 2-Core 162 63% 107 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 508 49% 406 Pts	64-Core 801 50% 801 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.4% Poor	Lighting 32.5 Reflection 30.5 Parallax 29.7 26% 30.9 fps	MRender 37.4 Gravity 31.2 Splatting 20.4 23% 29.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 232GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1014 839 879 858 867 875 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 52 Write 176 Mixed 408 SusWrite 889 88% 381 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 17.6 4K Mixed 0.4 10% 6.03 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 25.4 DQ Mixed 35.2 34% 56.1 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 340%
AGI512G17AI178 512GB 396 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 386GB free Firmware: U0430A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 201 205 204 210 211 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43% Average	Read 235 Write 209 Mixed 190 SusWrite 207 47% 210 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 37.4 4K Mixed 12.1 64% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 19.9 DQ Write 79.9 DQ Mixed 13.7 21% 37.8 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 110GB free Firmware: CC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 200 203 204 204 204 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 200 Write 168 Mixed 70.7 SusWrite 202 117% 160 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 112%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 64GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 56 57 57 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	32.7% Below average	Read 57.6 Write 55.1 Mixed 47.9 SusWrite 55.7 40% 54.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 54%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 218GB free Firmware: 20.04F20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 56 57 57 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 68.7 Write 59.4 Mixed 45.8 SusWrite 55.8 42% 57.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 69%
Samsung HM500JI 500GB-$100 8,795 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 34GB free Firmware: 2AC1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 29 29 29 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 32 Write 22.1 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 28.8 20% 26.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 47%
ST500DM0 02-1BD142 500GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 135GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 22.1 Write 21 Mixed 18.9 SusWrite 22.3 29% 21.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 62%
SMI USB DISK 8GB 3,022 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 0GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 18.9 Write 17.7 Mixed 19 24% 18.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1 70% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT42GR7MFR4A-H9 4x16GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 4 of 12 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.7% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 13.3 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 6.3 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 83.3 48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,414 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	152x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	148x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	130x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	172x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	96x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	61x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 98%, 24 samples	21x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $345

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16