Asrock A520M-HVS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics69.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A520M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '21 at 08:53
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 74.4
1-Core 149
2-Core 298
92% 174 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 888
90% 728 Pts
64-Core 1,073
66% 1,073 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.1% Good
Lighting 91.3
Reflection 89.4
Parallax 75.9
74% 85.5 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 79.7
Splatting 69.6
59% 71.9 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst Elite 120GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 378 22 27 36 33 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 429
Mixed 401
SusWrite 136
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 46.3
180% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 234
183% 249 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 91%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
920GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 152 167 174 154 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 162
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 160
93% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
140% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905734-180.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 18.2
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A520M-HVS Builds (Compare 513 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M-HVS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback