MSI X99A SLI Krait Edition (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A SLI Krait Edition (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181203
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateNov 11 '21 at 14:16
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 114
2-Core 220
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 704
66% 548 Pts
64-Core 900
56% 900 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.9% Average
Lighting 61
Reflection 63.1
Parallax 83.9
50% 69.3 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 66.5
Splatting 46.9
47% 59.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ZTC-PCIEG3-001T 1TB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0312C0G Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 74 470 69 894 73 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 1,218
Write 988
Mixed 433
SusWrite 307
163% 736 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 10.5
105% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 406
DQ Write 80.4
DQ Mixed 105
113% 197 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 108%
Great: 259%
Transcend TS1TSSD230S 1TB
224GB free
Firmware: R0810A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 466 450 441 446 443 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 436
Mixed 402
SusWrite 451
101% 451 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 95.6
4K Mixed 48.1
162% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 101
144% 266 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 114%
Great: 121%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
807GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 116 117 118 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 117
Write 114
Mixed 60.6
SusWrite 116
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$408
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
99.3% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 35.4
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 21.6
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A SLI Krait Edition (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X99A SLI Krait Edition (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $901
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback