MSI X99A SLI Krait Edition (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A SLI Krait Edition (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181203
Uptime2 Days
Run DateDec 28 '20 at 13:23
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 89.8
1-Core 109
2-Core 222
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 738
72% 590 Pts
64-Core 901
56% 901 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1420 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.3% Above average
Lighting 68.7
Reflection 62.2
Parallax 90.7
56% 73.9 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 71.8
Splatting 45.8
48% 60.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ZTC-PCIEG3-001T 1TB
519GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0312C0G Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1340 622 409 83 204 203 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,234
Write 1,332
Mixed 885
SusWrite 477
220% 982 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 24.1
192% 80.7 MB/s
DQ Read 415
DQ Write 758
DQ Mixed 380
347% 518 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 159%
Great: 259%
Transcend TS1TSSD230S 1TB
237GB free
Firmware: R0810A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 465 431 446 446 445 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 455
Mixed 404
SusWrite 448
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 49.9
169% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 102
145% 268 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 116%
Great: 121%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
812GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 118 118 117 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 116
Write 120
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 117
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$408
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
98.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 35.1
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 22.4
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A SLI Krait Edition (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X99A SLI Krait Edition (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $901
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback