| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 91.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | HP EliteBook 2560p (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 162B |
| Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161007 |
| Uptime | 0.8 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 25 '17 at 18:54 |
| Run Duration | 86 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.7%
Good
|
65% 112 Pts
|
39% 308 Pts
|
22% 354 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
HP(103C 162B) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
2.13%
Terrible
|
2% 2.48 fps
|
3% 3 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
91.3%
Outstanding
|
99% 445 MB/s
|
116% 40.9 MB/s
|
97% 168 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.2%
Average
|
46% 16.1 GB/s
|
43% 14.9 GB/s
|
53% 76.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical EliteBook 2560p Builds (Compare 367 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP EliteBook 2560p
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples | 118x |
| Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples | 97x |
| Core i5-2540MIntel $315Bench 52%, 16,964 samples | 92x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 340x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 21x |
| HD Graphics 4000IntelBench 2%, 106 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 18% - Very poor | Total price: $183 |