Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Memory 85.3 1-Core 99.6 2-Core 201 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 389 8-Core 499 57% 444 Pts	64-Core 498 31% 498 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 22,284 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 879C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (60^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.8% Average	Lighting 58.4 Reflection 59.9 Parallax 52.4 48% 56.9 fps	MRender 64.8 Gravity 51.3 Splatting 51.9 45% 56 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 410GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3H01103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 371 419 416 418 399 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Read 467 Write 342 Mixed 395 SusWrite 374 89% 395 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 72.3 4K Mixed 22.7 102% 39.2 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 122 133% 218 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 102%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB 3,164 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 931GB free Firmware: GKAOA94A SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 83 83 83 83 83 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 79.4 Write 77.8 Mixed 48 SusWrite 81.4 53% 71.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung-00CE M393B1G70BH0-YK0 4x8GB 378 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	MC Read 31.6 MC Write 35 MC Mixed 30.8 93% 32.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 13.4 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

RAM
M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsung-00CEBench 85%, 1,049 samples	149x
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynix-00ADBench 83%, 808 samples	135x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	76x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $370