Fujitsu LIFEBOOK UH574

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK UH574  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB34
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '21 at 07:44
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4500U-$393
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 82.4
1-Core 30.6
2-Core 135
50% 82.7 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 194
19% 154 Pts
64-Core 99.4
6% 99.4 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 1812) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.77% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2
Parallax 6.3
3% 3.9 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 3.9
3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.77%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 168 63 65 60 67 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.4% Above average
Read 247
Write 196
Mixed 209
SusWrite 102
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 26.7
104% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 143
115% 161 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 91%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8
4GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 12 9 9 9.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 35.6
Write 20.7
Mixed 22
SusWrite 12.7
28% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 3.5
213% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
28.4% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 6.7
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK UH574 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK UH574

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $482
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback