TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Biostar B460GTA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar B460GTA  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200929
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 11 '21 at 06:10
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 143
2-Core 262
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 887
83% 689 Pts
64-Core 1,116
69% 1,116 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 92.4%
 Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Device(107D 2791) ≥ 4GB; leadtek 3070
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.39
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 218
Reflection 206
Parallax 198
178% 207 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 153
Splatting 136
128% 159 fps
Poor: 135% ↑
This bench: 149%
 Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,415
Write 2,164
Mixed 1,484
449% 2,021 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 67.8
219% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 996
DQ Write 424
DQ Mixed 363
360% 594 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
146GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 135 133 133 134 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 106
Write 104
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 134
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 68.9%
 Great: 109%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
268GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 57 58 57 57 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 85.2
Write 78.3
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 56.7
52% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.5
133% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 40.9%
 Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 27.1
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 24.3
74% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 88%
 Great: 117%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical B460GTA Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Biostar B460GTA

CPU
Core i5-10400Intel  $126Bench 84%, 71,804 samples13x
Core i5-10400FIntel  $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples12x
Core i5-10500Intel  $140Bench 84%, 10,180 samples5x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples8x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia  $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples6x
RX 550AMD  $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples5x
SSD
CS900 480GBPNY  $35Bench 79%, 17,946 samples4x
SA400S37960G 960GBKingstonBench 70%, 56,609 samples4x
SSD 480GBPcieBench 174%, 185 samples4x
RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX  $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples5x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples4x
CL16-18-18 D4-3000 4x8GBUnknownBench 86%, 2,271 samples4x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $502
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback