ADD TO PC
BUILD

Mousecomputer A75F-M2

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Mousecomputer A75F-M2 (all builds)
Motherboard	MouseComputer A75F-M2
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110718
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 11 '21 at 02:45
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3850 APU-$80 3,108 User benchmarks, average bench 46% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Memory 59.8 1-Core 44.8 2-Core 91 40% 65.2 Pts	4-Core 181 8-Core 182 24% 181 Pts	64-Core 183 11% 183 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6550D 4,197 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Elitegroup(1019 3157) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	4.09% Terrible	Lighting 5.1 Reflection 5.3 Parallax 4.6 4% 5 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 4 Splatting 5.3 4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.09% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Aps-sl3n -240 240GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 258 88 55 63 63 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	40% Below average	Read 368 Write 281 Mixed 251 SusWrite 134 58% 259 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 11.6 4K Mixed 11.8 47% 13.5 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 12 DQ Mixed 21 26% 48.4 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 750GB-$55 4,103 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 674GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 120 122 122 120 122 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Read 114 Write 109 Mixed 74.5 SusWrite 120 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 67%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 466GB free Firmware: 19.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 118 119 119 120 120 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 123 Write 108 Mixed 73.6 SusWrite 117 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 8GB 229 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.4% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 13.2 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 9.9 25% 8.73 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback