Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive456% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH570
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '21 at 18:02
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 69.7
1-Core 186
2-Core 371
107% 209 Pts
4-Core 710
8-Core 1,184
115% 947 Pts
64-Core 1,444
89% 1,444 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 101%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 201A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7219
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 218
Parallax 157
134% 180 fps
MRender 154
Gravity 126
Splatting 107
103% 129 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 119%
Great: 144%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CA6-8D1024 1TB
857GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ERA0901 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3681 2588 1746 1836 1822 1808 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
456% Outstanding
Read 3,117
Write 4,102
Mixed 3,016
SusWrite 2,247
704% 3,120 MB/s
4K Read 82.6
4K Write 283
4K Mixed 123
432% 163 MB/s
DQ Read 1,560
DQ Write 1,139
DQ Mixed 1,360
1,014% 1,353 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 456%
Great: 427%
Sandisk Extreme 55AE 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 803 802 796 799 798 799 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 45%
Generic MassStorageClass 125GB
114GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 34 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 79.9
Write 33.2
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 34.8
60% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 4.6
312% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 44%
USB Flash Disk 4GB
2GB free, PID 800b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 5.9 5.8 5.8 5.7 5.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
7.24% Terrible
Read 21.2
Write 5.7
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 5.8
12% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1
72% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.24%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Gold Key Co Ltd NMSO416F82-3200E 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 30.1
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 41
SC Mixed 18.6
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409 Builds (Compare 1,445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback