Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive446% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH570
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '21 at 08:39
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 70.9
1-Core 183
2-Core 368
107% 207 Pts
4-Core 609
8-Core 778
89% 694 Pts
64-Core 855
53% 855 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 201A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 472.19
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 247
Parallax 170
138% 195 fps
MRender 173
Gravity 136
Splatting 119
114% 143 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 124%
Great: 144%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CA6-8D1024 1TB
859GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ERA0901 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2675 3316 1674 1793 1711 1830 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
446% Outstanding
Read 3,099
Write 4,162
Mixed 3,047
SusWrite 2,166
704% 3,119 MB/s
4K Read 82
4K Write 271
4K Mixed 121
423% 158 MB/s
DQ Read 1,540
DQ Write 1,108
DQ Mixed 1,315
985% 1,321 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 446%
Great: 427%
Sandisk Extreme 55AE 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 789 787 781 784 783 784 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 45%
Generic MassStorageClass 125GB
114GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 33 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 80.6
Write 34.2
Mixed 54
SusWrite 34.5
63% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 4.5
310% 5.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 44%
USB Flash Disk 4GB
2GB free, PID 800b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 5.8 5.8 5.7 5.7 5.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
7.32% Terrible
Read 21.4
Write 5.7
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 5.8
12% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1
73% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.32%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Gold Key Co Ltd NMSO416F82-3200E 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 31
105% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 42.7
SC Mixed 19.4
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409 Builds (Compare 1,442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback