Alienware Area-51m

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAlienware Area-51m  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware Alienware Area-51m
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210906
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 10 '21 at 12:57
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 88.8
1-Core 149
2-Core 297
97% 178 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 1,129
98% 836 Pts
64-Core 1,125
70% 1,125 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
Dell(1028 08C5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 61.6
Reflection 78
Parallax 73.2
50% 70.9 fps
Gravity 67.8
Splatting 68.2
60% 68 fps
Poor: 58% Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PC SN520 WD 256GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20240012 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 415 425 426 421 420 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 967
Write 1,069
Mixed 1,022
SusWrite 420
196% 870 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 95.2
4K Mixed 52.7
178% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 836
DQ Write 771
DQ Mixed 727
567% 778 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 155%
Great: 182%
Adata SU630 4TB
192GB free
Firmware: XA003R08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 60 102 107 77 59 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.3% Poor
Read 102
Write 111
Mixed 101
SusWrite 83.6
22% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 5.6
37% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 49.6
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 77.5
59% 77 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 102%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
464GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 155 161 158 164 157 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 1,264
Write 154
Mixed 220
SusWrite 191
98% 457 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 51.3
173% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 948
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 169
222% 424 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 140%
Great: 282%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSX8GX4M1A2400C16 01980000802C KHYXPX-MID 029E0000802C CMSX8GX4M1A2400C16 01980000802C KHYXPX-MID 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.3% Excellent
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 24.6
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 25.3
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Area-51m Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

System: Alienware Area-51m

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback