HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics79.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory56.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateNov 09 '21 at 18:12
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 55.3
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 190
62% 115 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 688
62% 523 Pts
64-Core 1,762
109% 1,762 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.9% Very good
Lighting 98.8
Reflection 107
Parallax 98.5
80% 102 fps
MRender 93.8
Gravity 97.3
Splatting 96.4
79% 95.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI MR9271-8i 250GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 64 127 164 146 163 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 49% Great: 55%
LSI MR9271-8i 1TB
368GB free
Firmware: 3.46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 144 144 144 144 143 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.8% Very poor
Read 142
Write 140
Mixed 62
SusWrite 143
27% 122 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 2
8% 2.5 MB/s
LSI MR9271-8i 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 3.46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 175 178 177 181 182 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
LSI MR9271-8i 2TB
141GB free
Firmware: 3.46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 243 243 242 243 241 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
207GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 33 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 43.5
Write 57.5
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 28.8
33% 44.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.6
189% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 27 27 33 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 106
Write 63.6
Mixed 65.1
SusWrite 29.3
49% 66 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
207% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 89%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
336GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 10 18 17 17 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 96%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
39GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 24 24 16 16 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 140
Write 46.9
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 21.5
73% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.7
136% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 32.7
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.2
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,766 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback