HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory58.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '21 at 23:18
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 190
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 695
62% 527 Pts
64-Core 1,745
108% 1,745 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (95 fps cap detected)
77.5% Very good
Lighting 95
Reflection 95
Parallax 95
77% 95 fps
MRender 94.2
Gravity 95
Splatting 95
78% 94.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI MR9271-8i 250GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 56 141 38 33 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.3% Above average
Read 452
Write 172
Mixed 250
SusWrite 80
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 14.8
84% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 29
55% 113 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 55%
LSI MR9271-8i 1TB
367GB free
Firmware: 3.46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 143 144 144 144 144 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.3% Very poor
Read 154
Write 134
Mixed 62
SusWrite 143
28% 123 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 2.1
8% 2.47 MB/s
LSI MR9271-8i 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 3.46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 171 151 173 170 169 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
LSI MR9271-8i 2TB
141GB free
Firmware: 3.46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 241 241 241 242 237 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
207GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 16 16 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 22.5
Write 23.3
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 15.5
17% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.5
177% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 16 16 16 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 25.5
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 15.6
18% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
193% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 13%
Great: 89%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
336GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 22 14 22 16 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 3,203
Write 4.7
Mixed 7
SusWrite 18.1
578% 808 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Mixed 0.3
350% 2.55 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 69.5
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 34
134% 46.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.5
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 113%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,766 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback