To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20191029
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 09 '21 at 04:56
Run Duration	286 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 99.2 2-Core 187 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 353 8-Core 642 60% 497 Pts	64-Core 805 50% 805 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 C580) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.11.1 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.3% Average	Lighting 58.2 Reflection 62.3 Parallax 82.5 47% 67.7 fps	MRender 64.2 Gravity 66.1 Splatting 46.8 47% 59 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingchuxing 512GB 512GB 505 User benchmarks, average bench 141% 79GB free Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 401 182 19 115 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 481 Write 397 Mixed 377 SusWrite 190 81% 361 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 71.9 4K Mixed 24.3 98% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 41.6 81% 156 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 224%
Xraydisk 256GB 256GB 1,063 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1111H0L SusWrite @10s intervals: 860 459 432 480 237 308 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	144% Outstanding	Read 1,332 Write 842 Mixed 833 SusWrite 463 193% 867 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 24.2 133% 52.7 MB/s	DQ Read 636 DQ Write 434 DQ Mixed 443 355% 504 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 144% Great: 156%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40 22,667 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 26GB free Firmware: GF100-07 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 44 49 56 55 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	33.6% Below average	Read 67.4 Write 76.8 Mixed 45.8 SusWrite 49.3 44% 59.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 42%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154 24,344 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 58GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 68 68 67 71 69 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Read 96.8 Write 47.8 Mixed 50.5 SusWrite 68.8 49% 66 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 59%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 20GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 70 70 72 74 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	43.4% Average	Read 78.3 Write 53.6 Mixed 55.5 SusWrite 72.4 48% 64.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 59%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 201GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 57 59 59 60 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	36% Below average	Read 65.1 Write 65.7 Mixed 35.4 SusWrite 60.2 42% 56.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.6 116% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 79%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 12,762 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 39GB free Firmware: 0712 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 127 127 130 128 129 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 70.3 Write 17.7 Mixed 41.9 SusWrite 128 47% 64.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 104%
Generic- SD/MMC 4GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4GB free, PID 0316 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	8.54% Terrible	Read 21.7 Write 6.7 Mixed 12 SusWrite 10.2 15% 12.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.3 84% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.54% Great: 14%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 17,632 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 6GB free, PID 61b6 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	9.75% Terrible	Read 32.5 Write 26.9 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 14.1 32% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 9.75% Great: 42%
Samsung D3 Station 2TB 2,805 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 110GB free, PID 6123 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 23 24 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 25.7 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 23.6 35% 26.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 80%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABF032 320GB 17GB free, PID 0888 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 16 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.8% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 26.9 Mixed 20.9 SusWrite 14.1 30% 23.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 73% 0.87 MB/s

Seagate USB 2.0 Cable 500GB 191 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 89GB free, PID 5020 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 32.1 Write 26.6 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 14 32% 24.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M393B5170GB0- 4x4GB 258 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	93.4% Outstanding	MC Read 39.4 MC Write 37.3 MC Mixed 33.1 105% 36.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 11.4 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 65.1 61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,602 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	720x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	281x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	267x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	619x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	306x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16