PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z800 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AECh |
Memory | 11.2 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160224 |
Uptime | 3.1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 08 '21 at 20:12 |
Run Duration | 265 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
|
74%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K5200
HP(103C 1095) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.2%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX200 1TB-$270
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 59 76 52 52 45 MB/s
|
48.6%
Average
|
|||
37.8%
Below average
|
||||
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
176GB free
Firmware: 01.00101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 78 80 79 79 MB/s
|
55.2%
Above average
|
|||
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
860GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 91 93 92 92 MB/s
|
57%
Above average
|
|||
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
13GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
|
7.76%
Terrible
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 319x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 189x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples | 180x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 161x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 88x |
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples | 68x |
SSD | |
---|---|
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples | 38x |
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 34x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |