HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory11.2 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateNov 08 '21 at 20:12
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 80.3
2-Core 145
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 546
51% 426 Pts
64-Core 1,133
70% 1,133 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200
HP(103C 1095) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.2% Below average
Lighting 34.1
Reflection 42.7
Parallax 49.7
28% 42.2 fps
MRender 52.4
Gravity 42.4
Splatting 36.5
35% 43.8 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 1TB-$270
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 59 76 52 52 45 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.6% Average
Read 224
Write 44.5
Mixed 160
SusWrite 62.5
27% 123 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 27.7
93% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 66.4
72% 124 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 104%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$80
46GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 66 65 66 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 66.5
Write 40.5
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 64.9
40% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 100%
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
176GB free
Firmware: 01.00101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 78 80 79 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 113
Write 103
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 79
70% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
860GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 91 93 92 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 108
Write 108
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 90.9
68% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57%
Great: 83%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
13GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
7.76% Terrible
Read 29
Write 8
Mixed 6
SusWrite 11.2
15% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 7.76%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B5270DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5270DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5270DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5270DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5270DH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5270DH0-CH9 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
44.2% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 16.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 7.8
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,949 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback