Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Memory 87.3 1-Core 81.4 2-Core 162 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 317 43% 320 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430 22,369 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 836D) 1GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	3.33% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 6 Parallax 1.3 3% 3.77 fps	MRender 5.6 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 3.3 4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.33% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fanxiang S101/240GB 240GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q1204B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 210 60 48 51 40 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.4% Below average	Read 232 Write 210 Mixed 206 SusWrite 89.7 41% 185 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 41.3 4K Mixed 16.9 74% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 24.5 DQ Write 86.4 DQ Mixed 1.1 17% 37.3 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 8GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.6 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 14.9 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	744x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	179x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	158x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	97x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	55x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 26%, 3,270 samples	39x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16