Aftershock N8xxEP6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAftershock N8xxEP6  (all builds)
MotherboardAftershock N8xxEP6
Memory12.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180810
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateNov 08 '21 at 14:20
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 168
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 486
49% 396 Pts
64-Core 639
40% 639 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 8500) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.26% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 65.5
Parallax 6.3
4% 25.7 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 10.6
7% 8.17 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.26%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 8500) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 462.30
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.8% Average
Lighting 54.8
Reflection 61.5
Parallax 54.9
45% 57.1 fps
MRender 60.6
Gravity 57.5
Splatting 58.5
48% 58.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1462 1313 1293 1261 1302 1323 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 2,140
Write 1,842
Mixed 1,418
SusWrite 1,326
377% 1,681 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 41.9
144% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 471
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 574
381% 457 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 229%
Great: 410%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
220GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 77 80 78 76 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 68.9
Write 87.8
Mixed 51.1
SusWrite 77.6
52% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 68%
VendorCo ProductCode 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 6 0 6.8 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 3.2
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 9.4
19% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 2.4
133% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 11%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.6% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 23.2
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 15
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N8xxEP6 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Aftershock N8xxEP6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback