Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom D510-$115 463 User benchmarks, average bench 20% BGA 473, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	20.5% Poor	Memory 37.3 1-Core 7.3 2-Core 13.1 16% 19.2 Pts	4-Core 23.6 8-Core 23.1 3% 23.4 Pts	64-Core 23.3 1% 23.3 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 25%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia ION 1,623 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 8455) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	0.53% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 0.3 Parallax 1 1% 0.7 fps	MRender 0.4 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 0.3 0% 0.37 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.53% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84 21,990 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 64 75 67 54 66 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29% Poor	Read 208 Write 99.3 Mixed 69.6 SusWrite 67.7 24% 111 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 18 4K Mixed 11.7 45% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 72.1 DQ Write 49.5 DQ Mixed 32.6 32% 51.4 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.93% Terrible	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 3 9% 3.23 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 2.8 8% 2.63 GB/s	Latency 215 19% 215 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 9.93% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 21%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Atom D510Intel $115Bench 20%, 463 samples	6x

GPU
IONNvidiaBench 1%, 1,623 samples	6x

SSD
Green 120GB (2016)WD $84Bench 53%, 21,990 samples	1x

RAM
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	5x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	1x

Value: 17% - Very poor

Total price: $199

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16