Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 99% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 98% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	18 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190624
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Nov 08 '21 at 09:26
Run Duration	269 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Memory 65 1-Core 105 2-Core 199 68% 123 Pts	4-Core 363 8-Core 646 61% 504 Pts	64-Core 982 61% 982 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Gigabyte(1458 404C) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	149% Outstanding	Lighting 220 Reflection 201 Parallax 212 179% 211 fps	MRender 186 Gravity 151 Splatting 134 126% 157 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 29 30 28 30 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 63GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 162 144 145 143 144 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Read 450 Write 441 Mixed 333 SusWrite 165 78% 347 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 72.4 4K Mixed 42 146% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 371 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 175 183% 299 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 108%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 298GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 235 242 243 233 248 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 474 Write 457 Mixed 385 SusWrite 242 87% 390 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 80.6 4K Mixed 48.8 162% 55.7 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 361 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 134%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$109 24,471 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 314GB free Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 233 240 246 233 243 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 358 Write 284 Mixed 209 SusWrite 240 61% 273 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 68.7 4K Mixed 20.5 87% 35.1 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 335 236% 296 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 104%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$74 92,081 User benchmarks, average bench 224% 305GB free Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 335 346 360 345 346 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	161% Outstanding	Read 1,377 Write 966 Mixed 1,510 SusWrite 366 236% 1,055 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 78.3 4K Mixed 54.2 176% 58.4 MB/s	DQ Read 760 DQ Write 531 DQ Mixed 647 483% 646 MB/s
Poor: 144% ↑ This bench: 161% Great: 295%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 130GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 435 444 439 445 456 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 448 Mixed 374 SusWrite 444 98% 433 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 78.5 4K Mixed 46.5 152% 52.8 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 360 271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905622-058.A00G G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GTZB 9905622-058.A00G G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GTZB 32GB 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	63.5% Good	MC Read 24.4 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 23.8 65% 22.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 20.7 SC Mixed 21.7 58% 20.3 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	420x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $647

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)