Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 08 '21 at 06:19
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 95.2
1-Core 134
2-Core 263
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 863
80% 669 Pts
64-Core 1,088
67% 1,088 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 186
Parallax 177
139% 178 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 177
Splatting 108
112% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 500GB-$60
296GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0116B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 404 6 2.7 37 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 512
Write 429
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 77.1
57% 260 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 0.6
42% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 97.3
DQ Write 11.1
DQ Mixed 0.7
14% 36.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 100%
Sandisk S31024G 1TB
458GB free
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 479 480 481 478 481 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 316
Mixed 383
SusWrite 475
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 47.8
181% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 259
214% 307 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 118%
Great: 121%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
992GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1862 1711 1720 1588 1536 1548 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
350% Outstanding
Read 2,623
Write 2,231
Mixed 1,852
SusWrite 1,661
469% 2,092 MB/s
4K Read 65.6
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 88.4
291% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,350
DQ Write 1,022
DQ Mixed 1,138
864% 1,170 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 350%
Great: 435%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
208GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 127 125 127 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 171
Write 161
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 126
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.9
203% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C15-8GVKB 04CD F4-3000C15-8GVKB 04CD F4-3200C16-8GVKB 04CD F4-3200C16-8GVKB 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 28.6
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 43.2
SC Mixed 29.7
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,040 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $633
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback