HP 550-127d

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 550-127d  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B47
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '21 at 14:00
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 226
75% 135 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 635
63% 516 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
HP(103C 6893) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.07
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 12.4
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 10.3
10% 12.5 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 13.6
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EYOTA-128GB 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R024N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 134 114 109 104 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 356
Write 113
Mixed 329
SusWrite 115
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 32.5
120% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 159
115% 148 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
31% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.5
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550-127d Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP 550-127d

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback