Gigabyte GA-Z68M-D2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68M-D2H  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '21 at 10:25
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 118
2-Core 223
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 572
60% 480 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2132 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Lighting 70.2
Reflection 71.6
Parallax 64.9
57% 68.9 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 66.3
56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
331GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 113 115 116 115 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 95.5
Write 54.7
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 114
61% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 84%
Toshiba MC04ACA500A 5TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 174 182 173 185 183 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 73% Great: 100%
USB 3.0 LucidPort USB300 2TB
419GB free, PID 5000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 24.1
Write 24
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 12
26% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 57%
ST350062 0AS 500GB
181GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 25.7
Write 22.4
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 11.9
26% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 14%
ST3000DM 008-2DM166 3TB
956GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 25.4
Write 20.7
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 11.9
26% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.5% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 16.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z68M-D2H Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68M-D2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback